Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)

Home Five Forces Analysis Index Coke vs. Pepsi - Five Forces Analysis Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)

Last Updated by Anonymous | Update This Page Flag this page Delete This Page

Add New Five Forces Analysis | Feedback

rating: 0+–x

A low concentration of suppliers means there are many suppliers with limited bargaining power. Low concentration of suppliers positively affects Coke vs. Pepsi. … "Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)" has a significant impact, so an analyst should put more weight into it. "Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)" is a difficult qualitative factor to defend, so competing institutions will have an easy time overcoming it. "Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)" will have a long-term negative impact on this entity, which subtracts from the entity's value. This statements will have a short-term negative impact on this entity, which subtracts from its value. This qualitative factor will lead to an increase in costs. This statement will lead to a decrease in profits. "Low concentration of suppliers (Coke vs. Pepsi)" is a difficult qualitative factor to overcome, so the investment will have to spend a lot of time trying to overcome this issue.
Five Forces Analysis Survey

This statement has a significant impact?

Has a positive impact over the long term?

Has a negative impact over the long term?

Has a positive impact over the short term?

Has a negative impact over the short term?

This statement leads to reduced costs?

This statement leads to increased costs?

This statement leads to increased profits?

This statement leads to decreased profits?

Easy to defend this advantage?

Easy to overcome this disadvantage?

Difficult to defend advantage?

Difficult to overcome this disadvantage?

Affected Investments